Skip to main content

The curious case of the DRS

When, something relating to the game of cricket is being discussed in India, then it can’t be put out of the spotlight. So has been the case with the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), or better mentioned as the DRS. The whole cricketing fraternity is trying their best to implement this in the various tour programs that will played in the future. But the BCCI is being adamant about not implementing it. At the recently concluded ICC meeting to decide upon the DRS implementation, it was decided that the various sub-sections of the technology involved will be taken, sans the Hawk-eye technology. The Indian cricket board, BCCI, is against it, as it feels that the technology is not yet up with the standards.

But as of now, the condition is that, during a bilateral series, the DRS technologies can be used if both the participating countries agree to it. And the additional reason, why everyone is against the implementation of it, is because of the cost involved. In a bilateral tournament, the hosting country has to bear the cost of the DRS use. So for the economically-backward cricket boards across the world, it would be out-of-bounds to implement it.

But there are another perspectives to the whole topic of implementation of the DRS. One is the on the viewers side. But as far as they are ensured that what they are viewing is legitimate, they don’t be having a problem. Second, and the main part, is from the side of the players. They are the ones who are sweating it out on the fields, playing day in and day out, for their respective countries. So they must also be allowed to officially comment on the use of the DRS. As was recently seen in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011, all the players were actually supportive of the review system, and there would have been scarcely any matches, where the allotted reviewing calls, were unused, given the chances. So the players will definitely go for it. And for ensuring the validity of the technology, its up to the technicians to decide upon it. They say that the Hawk-eye is not yet up to the mark. Well, if it is in fact the same thing that we people see during the television broadcasting replays, then I don’t think there is any problem in it, in viewing from a layman’s angle at least. And it actually tends to calculate the path of the ball appropriately well, than what would be visible to the naked eye of the umpire. After all, something is better than nothing. Till the technicians come up with a more advanced technology, the cricketing world can do with this. (This is just my opinion, the technicians may know more!).

As of now, the DRS techniques implemented, are just for the accidental-snick-of-the-ball type dismissals. DRS is more required to sort out the LBWs properly. The rest are not-so-common. More number of confusions come in the LBW decisions that are taken.

So it would be better if the respected officials come forth with a better solution (if they don’t intend to use the present techs at all). Otherwise, with Umpire faults getting more and more these days, it would be difficult for sincere cricket matches to happen!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isn't it better to say it to the face?

It's a straight question. Isn't it better to say it right to the face ? I mean, there are various instances in our life, when we don't say things to people. We somehow manage to avoid the situation, or compromise that the situation is covered up. So that, we don't have to face awkward circumstances. But actually, shouldn't we be doing the opposite thing ? In this new age, with means of communication moving into various realms, it has become possible to express yourself in easier ways, than meeting the person, and saying it to the them directly. And definitely, all persons, prefer the better versions of communication, since it doesn't involve so much of embarrassment. When you are texting the person about your anger, your frustrations. The reason for this is the recent incident that I came across. Two friends - staying in touch all the time, meet in person after a long time. But due to some complexes, one was upset with the other. And naturally, when they
2 comments
Read more

Vicious Circle of Survival of the Fittest

It's one of the famous theories existing in the world. The one part of the evolutionary theory proposed by Charles Darwin, which we all have learnt in school - "Survival of the fittest". Along the years of human evolution, the above said principle has seen to be followed by us as a species. And it is very evident in other species as well. The strong and the healthy ones, survive the competition and progress further in time. The ones who are weak, perish and the cycle repeats for numerous number of times. It might have been repeating for millions of years! Once one-sided, but it returns back! When we reflect on our society, we see the very repercussions of this theory in it. People have been evolving as civilizations along many years, and there have been remarkable changes in our societies as well. But as we should see two sides of everything, there are two sections of people, one which is very well off in their lives, and another section which is not at all so. P
2 comments
Read more

The Culture of a Train

  While closing the miles With at most sincerity Comes the responsibility Of staying true to yourself. Tales of people from everywhere And talks of everything  around The audience differs in whole But speaks a single language The journey speaks of oneness And of various adventures Of countless days and The numerous nights A singularity speaks Unknowingly sings its own song Of common dialects And permanent topics A train has its own identity From source to destination And carries along with it A prevalent culture through its people. Every traveller who joins the journey Becomes part of those verses Of miles and of hours Numerous, yet single in magnitude.
2 comments
Read more